Monthly Archive for July, 2000

Review: X-Men

Vaunted as the blockbuster to beat in the summer of 2000, the X-Men is a science fiction film based on the superheroes of Marvel Comics fame. X-Men memorabilia abounds, with the TV Guide producing no less than SIX collector’s editions with unique covers. The film is directed and co-written by Bryan Singer who gave us the modern classic “The Usual Suspects”.

The basic premise is that a group of evil mutated humans (led by ‘Magneto’ - Ian McKellan) are intent on ushering in a new age where they will be overlords of the normal population. But the good mutants or X-Men believe that mutants and humans both should have equal rights.

The six X-Men, led by Professor Charles Xavier (”Star Trek: TNG” star Patrick Stewart) consist of newly recruited Logan/Wolverine (wonderfully portrayed by Aussie Hugh Jackman, he looks like he stepped out of the comic book with his funky hair and sideburns) and Rogue (Anna “The Piano” Paquin), Cyclops, Jean Grey and Storm. Each X-Person has a unique mutant ability ranging from rapid healing to weather control.

There are three other enemies besides Magneto - Toad (Ray Park, AKA Darth Maul, who must have been making fun of his previous incarnation when he takes a typical Maul bowlegged stance and twirls a metal bar in lightsabre fashion), Sabretooth and the chameleon Mystique.

But this is no WWF battle of the heroes (even though Sabretooth is played by a former pro-wrestler), an engaging plot and dark atmosphere keeps the moviegoer entertained for almost two hours. It was one of those films that I wanted to continue watching when they were wrapping the main story up, and with lots of minor story arcs left unfinished I’ve no doubt there will be an X-Men II on it’s way shortly. Nice to see X-Men/Spidey/Hulk creator Stan Lee make an appearance too as a hot dog vendor!

****

Review: Virgin Suicides

“Cecelia was the first to go.” And so starts the first film directed by Sofia Coppola, daughter of Francis Ford and miscast daughter of Michael Corleone in the Godfather III. This was my second time seeing this film, and I enjoyed it even more the second time round. The film centres around the five daughters of the Lisbon family 25 years ago in Michigan - Cecelia [13], Lux [14], Bonnie [15], Mary [16] and Terese [17].

In her disillusionment with the world, more trees being cut down and animals becoming extinct every day, Cecelia attempts suicide but is rushed off to hospital just in time. When a male doctor tries to tell the girl that things aren’t that bad, she returns with one of the film’s classic lines. “Obviously, Doctor, you’ve never been a 13-year old girl.”

The Lisbon parents, a strict Catholic mother (played by Kathleen Turner) and a hapless mild-mannered Maths teacher (an unusually understated performance from the normally maniacal James Woods), decide to try and let their daughters mix more with the boys of the neighbourhood by inviting them over for dinners and parties on the advice of psychologist Dr. E.M. Horniker (short cameo by Danny DeVito - why the credits listed a stand-in for him I’ll probably never know). This does little to lift young Cecelia’s spirits, and she succeeds where she failed before.

The film moves on to focus on second youngest daughter Lux (Kirsten ‘Interview with the Vampire’ Dunst), and her relationship with school heartthrob Trip Fontaine. Unfortunately, the characters of the elder three sisters are left undeveloped and it’s hard to feel much sympathy for them when they are grounded by their parents after Lux fails to come home from a homecoming dance with Trip.

The film is interesting in that it is not narrated by any of the Lisbons or Trip, but rather from the viewpoint of one of a group of boys obsessed both with the sisters and also with collecting anything linked to them.

The second time around you sometimes notice something that perhaps shouldn’t be, like the news reporter who says she’s from ‘Channel 2′ appearing on ‘News Channel 8′, or an error in the number PI over Mr. Lisbon’s blackboard [okay, now I'm nitpicking!]. But apart from the hollow sisters, I really liked this film from the Coppolas [producer was Francis Ford and second unit director was Roman].

It also features a brilliant soundtrack by one of my favourite groups, the French band Air, with songs like “Ce Matin La” and constant reworkings of “Playground Love” which I just had to go and buy afterwards and it’s still vibraphoning in my head as I write! The film is based on a novel by Jefffrey Eugenides.

***1/2

Review: Small Time Crooks

Woody Allen really seems to be churning them out these days (or else I am losing months of my life). No sooner have “Celebrity” and “Sweet and Lowdown” come and gone than another Allen film, “Small Time Crooks” hits our screens.

This was a very funny film, mainly due to the talented lead actors - Allen himself and Tracey Ullman. Allen is Ray Winkler, a dishwasher who has spent two years in one of those hotels with the bars on the windows for an attempted bank robbery (they were all wearing Ronald Reagan masks so he got confused!). He’s married to Francis ‘Frenchie’ Fox (Ullman), and comes home one day with a foolproof plan to rob another bank. All he needs is $6000 so he and two friends can rent a shop near to the bank and tunnel into the vault.

I won’t say how but the co-conspirators come into a lot of money, and the rest of the film focusses on how these ordinary and sometimes downright stupid people deal with their newfound wealth. It’s basically an expansion of the old “you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear” saying, but if you’d turn out like the snobby art dealer character (played by Hugh Grant) then who’d want to try changing in the first place.

Allen plays an ordinary guy who just wants some of life’s more simple pleasures (cheeseburgers, gambling and a trip to Miami) and this was a refreshing change from the usual paranoid-neurotic character he favours. Also stars Jon “The Critic” Lovitz as the pyromaniac insurance claimee and veteran Elaine Stritch as a socialite.

***

Review: Road Trip

I went to this film knowing practically nothing about it apart from the title and the fact that I saw Tom Green on the poster. For those of you who are MTV-illiterate, Tom Green is the absolutely crazy presenter of “The Tom Green Show” which is like no hosted show you’ve ever seen before. Ranging from setting himself on the fire in the street to putting a dead cow’s head in his parents’ bed, Tom is the ultimate reaction seeker and his shows on MTV Dark (late at night!) are always good for a laugh if you like that kind of thing.

Anyway, the first face that appears on screen is Tom who plays an eternal student called Barry [Manilow]. He seems pretty normal as he gives a group a guided tour around his University of Ithaca campus, but as he relates his version of the facts about the college it becomes obvious to the tour group and to us that he doesn’t have a clue about the place. They complain to him that it’s the worst tour they’ve ever been on and probably the worst college they’ve seen (they’ve obviously never done a tour of a shopping mall) and he replies that this university was the setting for one of the greatest stories of all time.

[SPOILER]

Of course he then has to tell the story, which revolves around a student called Josh who falls in love with a college girl called Beth even though he has been having a long term long distance relationship with another girl called Tiffany who has moved to Austin, Texas. The basic premise is that Josh has been recording video messsages to post to Tiffany, but a friend of his accidentally mails a sex video of Josh and Beth to Tiffany (who is away for a few days at a relation’s funeral). Josh and a couple of buddies have to make a road trip to Austin to retrieve the video before Tiffany returns from the funeral.

The buddies are E.L., played by typecast Seann W. Scott who gets a cheer as soon as he first appears on screen [no doubt from those remembering him as Stifler from "American Pie" or more recently Billy from "Final Destination"], and Rubin, a regular pot-smoker with a pet snake. They persuade a mild-mannered skinny geek called Kyle to drive them in his dad’s Ford Taurus.

Buddy Barry Manilow (Tom Green) is left in charge of Rubin’s pet snake and is supposed to feed it a mouse every few days - we have some hilarious scenes with Barry showing the non-hungry snake exactly how to eat the mouse, and eventually getting into a fight with the snake.

Meanwhile, the journey is going so terribly wrong for the main characters that it looks like there’s no hope of things ever righting themselves. The buddies total the car after a ‘Dukes of Hazzard’ style ravine jump and then run out of money less than halfway through the trip. But I’ll leave it at that and ruin no more, I’ll just say there’s plenty more memorable moments to enjoy: the viagra-taking grandpa, the mistaken identity incident in Boston, E.L.’s sperm donation, and the over-romantic tour guide.

Fans of American Pie will love this teen flick, and I can honestly say that I laughed most of the way through the film. It could have done with some more of Tom Green’s mad antics, but I’m sure we’ll see more of that on the big screen in the future.

**1/2

Review: Mission Impossible II

“Was it good?”, a girl outside asked a man coming out of the cinema beside me. “Terrible”, he replied. I didn’t rate it very highly either, and it certainly wasn’t up to the standard of director John Woo’s previous two offerings “Face Off” and “Broken Arrow”.

I haven’t actually seen the first Mission Impossible film but unless it was absolute drivel (doubtful since they made MI2), it proves that the sequel theory (’oh, the second film in a series is always better, look at the Godfather II, Star Trek II, Superman II etc.’) doesn’t always hold true.

The first thing that upset me slightly about the film was that there was no Jim Phelps character (played by Peter Graves on TV and Jon Voight in the first film), it’s a bit like leaving Hannibal out of the A-Team if you know what I mean. Okay, there was an IMF leader or director-type character (played by that other Hannibal, an uncredited Anthony Hopkins), but that lacks the continuity I like to see in film serieses, and as far as I know, Tom Cruise is the only actor to appear in both films (perhaps they are going James Bond style…).

Apart from that, the action scenes were spectacular but slightly spoiled by the fact that we’d seen most of them before in the trailers. Woo also makes plenty use of the “face off” idea with everybody pretending to be somebody else, and if you’re outside the 10 to 70 age bracket it may all be a bit confusing.

I did like the casting of Australian and British actors for characters in the film as it added to the international feel they were going for with segments in Spain and Australia. They also kept the wonderful theme music by Lalo Schifrin, revamped for the noughties by film composer Hans Zimmer.

Slightly drawn out in places [baddie comes back one time too many as usual] but entertaining nonetheless, I’d wait for it on video though.

*1/2

Review: Me, Myself and Irene

The Farrelly Brothers (”There’s Something About Mary”, “Dumb and Dumber”) bring us another dose of overdone toilet humour with this comedy about a schizophrenic Rhode Island policeman (Charlie - Jim Carrey) who ends up on the run with a woman (Irene - Renee Zellwegger from “Jerry Maguire”) being chased by her criminal ex-boyfriend and the corrupt feds working for him.

That’s about it from the plot side of things, in fact if they’d left out the whole weak plot and boring character empathy parts, I’d probably have enjoyed it exactly the same and been out of the cinema sooner because I felt the film sagged in between Carrey’s crazy performances.

I also couldn’t see the reason for the big American hype over the three triplet sons of Carrey’s character (okay, there’s an initial laugh factor because they are [1] big, [2] black, [3] super-smart and [4] obviously not his sons!) - they were on Jay Leno last week and he was predicting big things for them, I’m not so sure…

I _can_ see big things happening for Jim Carrey who was cruelly passed over for Academy Awards for both “The Truman Show” and “Man on the Moon” where he showed he can act seriously as well as comedically. The thing about Carrey is that he has this mad double jointed face and body that can crack you up with laughter one minute, and his big brown sad eyes can have you feeling sympathy for him the next.

While I expect he will gain Oscar recognition for his more serious roles eventually, I hope he never gives up his funny side because he is the captain of comedy at the moment.

Best scenes - the dead cow, Hank’s first appearance, Anna Kournikova’s boyfriend, and the cotton mouth syndrome!

**

Review: Final Destination

Final Destination is the first film from director James Wong, and is produced by associate Glen Morgan. Wong and Morgan are more well known for their work directing and producing for the small screen, mainly on “The X-Files”. They are also responsible for the short lived series “Space: Above and Beyond” where Earth’s space marine corps battled against a hostile alien race known as the ‘Chigs’ for two seasons.

The duo are on familiar territory here with this supernatural tale of a New York student who saves the lives of five friends and a teacher when he has a premonition that the plane they are supposed to take to Paris on a school trip is about to explode. The lucky group are pulled off the plane just before takeoff by airport security when Alex (the main prophet dude) starts to rave about an explosion, and sure enough it disintegrates when a few minutes airborne.

[SPOILER]

Now that’s all well and good, and you might think this is a film about someone who knows when people are going to die or when disasters are going to happen (a typical X-Files storyline). But it eventually becomes apparent that death wants to finish off the seven survivors in the order that they should have died were they still on the plane. The death force then proceeds to take out the students in bizarre and progressively more gruesome ways.

By the time it reaches the teacher character (played by Kristen Cloke - “Space” regular Janssen, guest in the classic “X-Files” ‘In the Field Where I Died’ episode, and a member of the Millennium group to boot), you know she isn’t going to die of a simple gunshot wound. It’s also hard not to chuckle when the silly Billy character is killed by a train (no, I haven’t ruined it for you, he doesn’t get run over by the train itself) moments after declaring he wasn’t going to die.

Overall, I enjoyed “Final Destination” for the teen horror flick it was, which didn’t really take itself too seriously with character names like ‘Clear Waters’! Looking forward to more from the Wong/Morgan duo soon…

***

Review: Est-Ouest

“If somebody is to achive what they desire, somebody else has to pay. But Alexei is fully aware of that. He is ready.” So goes the slogan for the French film East-West by Regis Wargnier, I’m not sure was that translated directly from French to English as it reads a little strangely. But the film’s English subtitles suffer from no such problem with the spoken language switching from French to Russian unknownst to the viewer.

Sony Pictures Classics bring us this interesting tale of a young Russian doctor with a French wife and son who decide to move to the new USSR when an amnesty is offered to the millions of Russians who fled the country 30 years earlier after the 1917 civil war.

The mood on the boat from France to Russia is cheerful, with many looking forward to seeing their home country (or soon to be adoptive home country for the French and second-generation Russian emigrants). However, the happy feeling turns to fear soon after arrival as soldiers split up families and eventually shoot a second-generation Russian when he tries to rejoin his father in another group.

This sets the tone for the rest of the film as Dr. Alexei and wife Marie quickly realise their new life is not the ideal existence it was purported to be. They are forced to share a house (and later on their own room) with a number of families in Kiev.

[SPOILER]

The doctor then has an affair with nosey neighbour Olga in the house, this put me off a bit because the adversity seemed to be bringing the Russian-French family together and I didn’t understand why he would have such a sudden character change. His wife didn’t understand either and kicked him out of their room, soon afterwards developing a relationship with a young swimmer named Sacha.

Famous French actress Catherine Deneuve appears as a famous French actress touring with a stage production of Victor Hugo’s “Marie Tudor”. The real Marie (Dr. Alexei’s wife) asks for help from the actress to escape from the USSR, and actress pledges to help. Sacha is also infected by the desire to flee from east to west, and his love for Marie drives him to train for the Russian swimming team travelling to Vienna in the hope that he could hide there and she could join him later.

Our faith in the good doctor is semi-restored around this point when it emerges that he has apparently been sleeping with neighbour Olga so that she would not have a chance to make her regular reports on his French wife to the secret service (all foreigners are imperialist spies apparently!).

The film has plenty of tension too with Sacha’s six-hour (sped up for dramatic purposes) ten-mile swim towards freedom and Marie’s encounter with a communist security checkpoint outside the potential safety of a French embassy (I haven’t said if either of them make it so you’ll have to see it for yourself!).

I need to confirm if the film is based on a true story or not as it has some of those character paragraphs at the end that tell you what happened to the people after the film’s story ends. With a fine score by Patrick Doyle, the film is definitely worth viewing for French film fans and Russian history buffs alike. Running time is around two hours.

***

Review: Chicken Run

From the creators of Oscar winning animation shorts “Wallace and Gromit” comes the first feature length film in a set of five contracted by Spielberg’s Dreamworks company. Not only is this film great fun but you appreciate it all the more when you realise it took around six years to produce the finished product, with two or three seconds of footage recorded daily [Hmmm, 2 seconds a day for 6 years gives 70 minutes of film, and 3 seconds a day gives 105 minutes of film, okay that sounds about right!].

Neither absent-minded inventor Wallace nor his trusty hound Gromit make an appearance here, instead the film centres around the chicken coop of Tweedy Farm and the many escape plots being hatched (sorry) by the hens therein to leave its fenced off confines. All seems lost when plan after plan is foiled by Mr. Tweedy and his farmdogs, and ringleader Ginger is about to give up hope when Rocky the “Flying” Rooster falls from the sky into their farm.

When the evil Mrs. Tweedy buys a chicken pie machine, Rocky (Australian Mel Gibson does the arrogant, self-centered Yank thing to a tee) is forced to teach the rest of the chickens how to fly the coop.

Chick jokes and puns abound in this film, but my favourite part is when the chickens begin their escape - Mr. Tweedy sees them and shouts to his wife that “the chickens are revolting” and she (hating the hens and taking the other meaning) agrees that they are indeed revolting.

I saw this film in the States with a mixture of children and adults, and I’m not sure if first of all they understood a lot of the Britspeak like “nowt” and “holidays” etc., and secondly I wonder if all the hens didn’t look the same to the younger kids (they seemed a bit restless at the beginning before Rocky popped in).

However everyone coming out of the cinema seemed to have enjoyed it immensely, some saying it was their second trip, and this grown up will return as well.

****

Review: Apt Pupil

From director Bryan Singer (”Usual Suspects”, “X-Men”) comes an adaptation of a novella of the same name by Stephen King about a former Nazi officer living in the USA who is recognised by a smart local teenager called Tom Bowden.

Cocky Tom (Brad Renfro) confronts the German ‘Janker’ (Ian “Richard III” McKellan) with the evidence he has been collecting - photographs from history books on the holocaust (personal hobby of his) and photographs from the present after the teen spots the Nazi on a bus ride, fingerprints from the German’s postbox and matching sets from the Israeli criminal database. Tom threatens to call the police unless Janker tells him everything he wants to know about the war - “what they’re afraid to tell us in school”.

After an initial period of denying he was a soldier and claiming to be just an ordinary US citizen (with a strong German accent!), Janker relents under pressure of police involvement.

[SPOILER]

Tom starts to spend evenings at the German’s house, forcing him to relive horrifying tales of gas chambers and ovens and even to wear an SS uniform at one point. McKellan is truly chilling when dressed up and even scares the emotionless teenager when he enters Nazi marching and saluting mode.

Bowden’s father (Bruce Davison, the senator from “X-Men”) invites the old man (that Tom has been ‘reading’ to) over for dinner, and it is around this point that Tom’s life has become so entangled with the Nazi’s (and so haunted by nightmares of his stories) that he can no longer out the German without acknowledging his own complicity.

His control over the situation and hold over Janker begins to slip, and with school grades dropping he is called in for a meeting with guidance counsellor Edward French (David Schwimmer plays the curly haired and mustachioed geek with a good heart). Janker impersonates Tom’s grandfather in this meeting and explains that the boy’s problems stem from his parents’ excessive drinking and fighting (lies, all lies).

We’re not sure is Janker truly an evil character (even though he certainly looks like the really evil twin of Max Von Sydow on a very bad day) or was he doing “what had to be done” under orders - until the scene with the cat.

I’ll try not to ruin any more of the film in case you haven’t seen it, director Singer was aware that the sensitive nature of the film could cause problems but has dealt with it well by “telling the truth” as he said himself.

The film’s strength lies in the two main actors. Ian McKellan is perfect in this role - he has the old German accent with a Californian twinge (very different from his normal polished Shakespearean tones), silver hair / wrinkles / liver spots courtesy of his makeup artist from “Richard”, and lots of padding to give him that stooped over look. Newcomer Brad Renfro is excellent too as the nasty youth who picks up traits and tactics from the old German - apparently he is a Stephen King fan and when he heard they were filming THE “Apt Pupil” he just had to be in it.

***1/2